Is a lecture just a lecture?

by | Tuesday, May 05, 2009

My mashup of a commercial has been on YouTube for a while and just yesterday I noticed that someone had left a very thoughtful comment… and that comment got me thinking… and hence this posting.

To start with, if you haven’t seen the videos here they are again.

Here is the original commercial:
[youtube width=”425″ height=”355″]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e50YBu14j3U[/youtube]

And my response:
[youtube width=”425″ height=”355″]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uozG9td6AE[/youtube]

The comment by user witchyrichy to my mashup was as follows:

Nice mashup…but I’m not sure that I agree that a lecture is still a lecture. The technology makes it possible to break that lecture into segments, review different sections, and even, as you did here, cut and paste the important pieces into something new. I listened to a talk by Steinem through Yale’s itunes site: yes, it was a lecture but it was one I would have never heard otherwise, one I could share with others, etc. So, a lecture isn’t always a lecture, imho.

I think the witchyrichy makes a really good point here and something that had been nagging me a bit. What is somewhat ironic is that Matt Koehler and I have been trying for the past year or so to develop a new form of presentation, one that takes a lecture and makes it dynamic. A good example would be the keynote we gave at the SITE 2008 conference Thinking Creatively, Teachers as Designers of Technology, Pedagogy & Content. We “appropriated” a bunch of ideas from Larry Lessig and Dick Hardt (and in the case of the SITE keynote, Steven Colbert!).

To add (self)-insult to irony, I have blogged about lectures and how they can be creatively constructed previously here. Read my earlier posting about The 60 second lecture.

To sum it up, it appears that I may have gone a bit overboard with my critique of a lecture. That said, the larger point I was trying to make in my mashup, about a lecture not necessarily being the best use of technology for teaching, still stands.

A few randomly selected blog posts…

Happy Valentine’s Day: Old/New ambigram

Happy Valentine’s Day: Old/New ambigram

I had made this design a while back, just hadn't posted it online. (Actually a hand-drawn version is on this website somewhere.) Have a great day, everyone!

Praise-blame ambigram in 3D

Jon Good has been playing around with some new 3D printers we just bought and this is what he printed for me - a 3-D version of the "praise-blame" ambigram (click here for the 2-D version). How cool is that! So what you are seeing in the top half is the printed...

Disciplined Thinking

One of the key aspects of the TPCK framework is the manner in which disciplinary knowledge interacts with pedagogy and technology. Till this date I did not have an adequate way of discussing how disciplinary knowledge and pedagogy interact, that is until I came across...

Untangling a decade of creativity scholarship

Untangling a decade of creativity scholarship

How do we capture a program of scholarship in an image? This is particularly complicated when the work is a tangled web of connections between research, teaching and practice, spread out over multiple publications, presentations and people. One attempt to do...

Shreya makes the newspaper!

For Halloween, my daughter, Shreya's fifth grade class entertained a bunch of first-graders with a spooky music and dance show. A news reporter was there and her photo (Shreya's not the news reporter's) ended up on the cover of The Towne Courier, the local community...

Photos from Twente

I have uploaded a set of photos from my walk around the Twente University campus onto Flickr. You can see the entire set by clicking on the image below. Enjoy.

By Design & by Chance: New Publication

By Design & by Chance: New Publication

Dinner in Bangalore with some of the keymembers of the MSU-APU partnership * One of the highlights of my career at MSU was the partnership we built between the College of Education and the Azim Premji University / Azim Premji Foundation....

April 2, 2011… O frabjous day!

To understand the significance of April 2, 2011, I have to go back 28 years, back to the summer of 1983. I had just finished 10th grade, and that summer I took a trip to the hills of North India, as a part of a social work volunteer effort. I remember sleeping on the...

A pome a day

Greg Casperson is a graduate student in our Ed Psy & Ed Tech program. He has been engaged, over the past few months, in the most interesting experiment. He carefully selects and posts to his website one poem every day! Greg's RSS feed has become one of the first...

5 Comments

  1. Prakash

    I liked the simple and yet powerful message…lecture is lecture it does’nt matter where?when?on what device one sees..

    Reply
  2. Punya Mishra

    Thanks Sean that was really well put. I particularly like the sentence: “If I had the resources to produce such a slick video as the one you mashed, you had better believe that it would send a different message.” I think that hits the real issue on the head. We are defined by the choices we make and the people who made the video felt that a lecture streamed through multiple devices was the best way to represent themselves.

    Reply
  3. Sean Nash

    No- I still think your take on the ad was spot-on. Here is why I say so:

    When you market something… you highlight the very best your product has to offer. To not do so would just be weird. If I were putting together a three minute video that markets the student experience in my classroom, I WOULD depict me delivering content directly to students. However, I would be very careful about how many seconds of those three minutes were taken up by this view.

    I would want the amount of time I am “lecturing” to reflect a similar ration of what goes on in my classroom. I would also want the receiver of said video to come away with the obvious notion that what I value as in instructor are the conversations that originate from students… and perhaps especially the rich conversations that happen between my students.

    I would also want to show them exploring in tactile ways… writing, thinking, reading, annotating, rearranging and creating content of their own. If I had the resources to produce such a slick video as the one you mashed, you had better believe that it would send a different message.

    Teacher talk when done by a sensitive and skillful professional is not only acceptable… it is inspiring. However, we all know that if the whole of the educational experience doesn’t move beyond this then something is certainly lacking.

    I think the video is very telling, and I would defend your interpretation of its message.

    Sean

    Reply
  4. Punya Mishra

    Mike, thanks for sharing your idea. I think it is a great way of taking a lecture (through the use of technology) to another level. Let me know how the experiment pans out. thanks ~ punya

    Reply
  5. Mike H

    When I saw your mashup, it made me start experimenting with lectures via Voicethread where it would allow students multiple views, repeats as witchywitch said, and also have the lecture act as a discussion board that can last throughout the year. Imagine students remembering a lecture about the Bill of Rights while studying the Reconstruction Period 2-3 months later in class. They can go back to that original lecture and continue to add to the conversation.

    Reply

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Follow up to Lilly Seminar « Leigh Graves Wolf - [...] Finally, we didn't have time to show Punya's response to the video Nicole started with this evening.  Here is…

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *