Day 2, after lunch, Kozma

by | Thursday, August 21, 2008

I just starred in a movie!

Turns out that they are making a documentary about the conference and were interviewing various participants. So I ended up out holding a microphone in front of a conference banner (that would be the background), speaking into a video camera. It was a rather strange experience, mainly because I had to speak into a camera lens while the person asking me questions was to the left of the camera. I tried to keep my focus on the camera but it was difficult, if not impossible, not to shift my eyes to the left. I am sure it has given me a not-so-nice, shifty look. We shall just have to wait and see.

The upshot of this is that I missed most of Bob Kozma‘s talk. The abstract is as follows:

India is currently engaged in national and state efforts to formulate ICT policies in education. But how can these policies and their implementation contribute to the economic and social development goals of India? Dr. Robert Kozma identifies factors that contribute to economic and social development, including education and ICT. He presents a conceptual framework—the Knowledge Ladder—that allows policymakers to analyze education reform in the context of economic and social development. The framework is systemic in that it considers the introduction and use of ICT in schools along with parallel changes in pedagogy, curriculum, assessment, teacher training, and school organization. It provides different models or approaches to systemic changes that are appropriate to development context and enable decision makers to craft policies and programs that advance economic and social development goals. At the same time, it facilitates specific ICT decisions related to amount of equipment, location, networking, and software.

I read through his paper (The Knowledge Ladder: Using ICT and Education Reform to Advance Economic and Social Development Goals) yesterday found it quite insightful – particularly in helping us articulate the application of the TPACK framework and to make it applicable to multiple economic contexts. This has been somewhat of a challenge for me, and something I have struggled with when in India and speaking about Ed Tech. I think that Bob’s framework allows me to think about how different technologies can play different roles depending on where on the ladder you are.

He defines 4 kinds of economies:

Subsistence Economy -> Commercial Economy ->Emerging Economy -> Information Economy

Paralleling these is 4 kinds of educational needs

Basic Education -> Knowledge Acquisition -> Knowledge Deepening -> Knowledge Creation

He then goes out and lays out how this influences policy, professional development, pedagogy, curriculum, assessment, school organization and ICT use.

Cool stuff.

Topics related to this post: Conference Presentation

A few randomly selected blog posts…

Design & Creativity at Purdue

I will be at Purdue University, at the School of Engineering Education later this week, making a presentation titled: Unpacking Design and creativity: What I think I know, and what I (quite certainly) don't. I am quite looking forward to this trip, mainly because I...

Presentation/Workshop at Twente

I just completed a presentation at the symposium organized by the Department of Curriculum Design & Educational Innovation, University of Twente. Later this afternoon I will be conducting a workshop on creativity and the TPACK framework. The slides for both the...

3 pieces of wisdom, one muddled conclusion

Just came up with this in response to something Leigh had said on Facebook... thought it ought to be saved for the future: Great fools think that birds of a feather seldom differ together! I wonder what it means? Can you identify the three nuggets of wisdom that went...

TPACK Handbook 3rd Edition (Plus: Covers that didn’t make it)

TPACK Handbook 3rd Edition (Plus: Covers that didn’t make it)

Twenty years. That's how long it's been since Matt Koehler and I published the 2006 article that gave the TPACK framework its name. The core ideas have aged reasonably well, even as the technologies around us have shape-shifted in ways we never anticipated. What we...

Educational Change by Design: A school for the future

Educational Change by Design: A school for the future

How do we design a school for the future? This recent article seeks to capture (in the form of a case study) our recent experience in designing such a school. The design process was a collaborative process involving a partnership with a local school district and the...

Demotivational Posters II

A few weeks ago I posted a note about an assignment I gave my students in the on-campus version of the MAET program. They had completed an unit on motivation and had watched the RSA / Daniel Pink video and their task was was to create demotivational posters, (along...

Designing shared spaces, one example

Design is about engineering. It is about art. And most importantly it is about the psychology of individuals and groups and their interactions with artifacts. I am always on the lookout for examples of good (or bad) design. Sadly I too often come across the latter...

Happy Thanksgiving

Happy Thanksgiving

 I feel lucky (and quite undeserving) for all that I have been given in this life. It is no surprise that Thanksgiving is my favorite day of the year. To celebrate Thanksgiving 2016 here is a new version an ambigram that I had made before.

Online vs. face to face: On asking the wrong question

The NYTimes has a story today about how higher prices of gas are driving up the demand for online learning. This is a great example of "synergistic" effects between seemingly disparate events that could not have been easily anticipated - but seem to make perfect sense...

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *