It Takes Two: A scientific romp using AI

by | Friday, June 23, 2023

Dark ‘n’ Light is an e-zine that “explores science, nature, social justice and culture, through the arts and humanities.” It is a labor of love by a small, dedicated team led by Susan Matthews, former legal and policy wonk, turned editor and podcaster. I came to know of Susan and the Dark ‘n’ Light a couple of years ago and have avidly followed their website, and podcasts. I recommend it highly.

Dark ‘n’ Light is celebrating its second anniversary with a special contest around the theme of “IT TAKES TWO.” (See the announcement below or on Instagram). I haven’t really decided if I am submitting anything for the competition, but I did want to see what generative AI could come up with on this theme. (This should come as no surprise to anybody who has been following my experiments with generative AI.) Below are some of the results of these experiments.

I started by asking ChatGPT to provide some interesting scientific examples of the idea “it takes two.” This is what it came up with:

  • It takes two chromosomes to determine the sex of a human. One chromosome comes from the mother’s egg and the other from the father’s sperm. The combination of XX results in a female, while XY results in a male.
  • It takes two electrodes to make a battery. A battery is a device that converts chemical energy into electrical energy by moving electrons from one electrode (the anode) to another (the cathode) through an electrolyte.
  • It takes two slits to create an interference pattern of light. In the famous double-slit experiment, a beam of light is passed through two narrow slits and then observed on a screen behind them. The light forms a pattern of bright and dark bands, which shows that light behaves like a wave and interferes with itself.
  • It takes two groups to conduct a controlled experiment. A controlled experiment is a scientific test in which one factor is changed at a time, while all others are kept constant. The group that receives the change is called the experimental group, while the group that does not is called the control group. By comparing the results of the two groups, scientists can test their hypotheses and make predictions.

Not too bad. I was impressed, in particular, with the examples of the two-slit experiment, and the 2 groups required for a controlled experiment. Not something I would have come up with on my own. As a followup I asked it to create poems that in their structure captured this sense of two-ness. In response is said that:

There are many forms of poetry that use rhyme, meter, or syllable count to create patterns, but I couldn’t find any that specifically go 2 by 2. However, here are some forms that have some elements of twos in them: such Couplet, Dizain and Double Dactyls.

Having never heard of Double Dactyls, so I asked it what that looked like. According to ChatGPT

Double Dactyls are a light-hearted poem that has two stanzas of four lines each. The first line of each stanza is a nonsense phrase, such as “higgledy-piggledy”. The second line of each stanza is a name, usually of a person. The last line of each stanza is a single word that is a double dactyl (a word with six syllables where the first and fourth syllables are stressed). The other lines have two dactyls each (a dactyl is one stressed syllable followed by two unstressed syllables). The rhyme scheme is abab.

So I asked it “to create four double dactyls for each of the ideas ‘it takes two’ ideas that you shared. Pick a scientist who would be most appropriate for the topic. For instance for electrodes you could choose Galvani

Chromosomally
Gregor Johann Mendel
Studied the peas and their
Traits inheritance
He found out the laws of
Segregation, assortment
And the importance of
Dominance
Electrochemically
Michael Faraday
Invented the first ever
Battery
He used two metals and
Sulfuric acid
To make electric
Energy
Interferentially
Thomas Young’s experiment
Showed that the light can act
Like a wave
He used two slits and a
Monochromatic source
And saw the pattern that
Light can make
Experimentally
Louis Pasteur’s test case
Disproved the theory of
Spontaneous generation
He boiled some broth in a
Swan-necked flask and showed that
Microbes need air for their
Reproduction

What I loved about this was how each of the poems, though on different topics, were held together by the first word, each of which rhymed with each other. Nice.

Finally I asked it to UNDERMINE the idea of “it takes two” mainly “Beause [sic] the world is complex and it always take more than two.” And I asked to make this point in the form of couplets.

It takes two chromosomes, but not alone
They need the cell, the egg, the sperm, the womb
And all the factors that affect the growth
Of every living being from the loom
It takes two slits of light, but also more
They need the source, the screen, the eye, the brain
And all the math and logic to explore
The mystery of nature and explain
It takes two electrodes, but not just
They need the liquid, wire, and circuit
And all the laws of physics that adjust
The flow of charge and energy and bit
It takes two groups of subjects, but not only
They need the method, data, and analysis
And all the ethics and the peer review
To make the science valid and rigorous

Not bad at all. Finally I asked it to create some prompts for generating images for “it takes two”—and this is where it failed quite miserably, coming up with hugely cliched prompts. For instance, one of the suggestions was:

A pair of hands holding each other, with a heart-shaped ring on one of the fingers. The background is a sunset over a beach, with the words “It takes two” written in the sand.

I mean, seriously. That’s pretty bad. And it had more, along the same lines. Cliched and just plain bad ideas.

So I came up with my own prompt, after playing around a bit with Firefly:

An abstract oil painting of tree branches and lungs symmetrically side by side like ying and yang

Here are some of the pieces it came up with

Now these are some cool images!

A few randomly selected blog posts…

TPACK in the SAGE Encyclopedia of Ed Tech

The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Technology, edited by Dr. Michael Spector just got published. We have one article in it on (no surprise there) TPACK! Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2015). TPACK (technological pedagogical content knowledge). In J. Spector (Ed.),...

Inside-Out: Happy 2015

Every winter break (for the past six years) our family creates a video to welcome the new year. This is no ordinary video. It requires days of discussion, planning, construction, shooting, and editing. Our videos never feature us (expect maybe a still-shot of the...

Darwin Day & A new Gallup Poll

Charles Darwin 12 February 1809 – 19 April 1882 On this day, it is sobering to read the results of the latest Gallup Poll: On Darwin’s Birthday, Only 4 in 10 Believe in EvolutionOn the eve of the 200th anniversary of Charles Darwin's birth, a new Gallup Poll shows...

Miami / Globe Video Update

Miami / Globe Video Update

I had posted earlier about the work our design initiatives team is involved with at Miami Junior-Senior High School. Essentially the entire faculty and leadership at the school have taken on the challenge of re-imagining the 7/8 curriculum through an integrated...

The value of research

A few years ago I was asked to talk to some major donors of the College as a part of the kick-off of the MSU Capital Campaign. The text below is what I had written out prior to giving the talk. It is not an exact transcript of what I actually said, since I...

Mishra, Dirkin & Cavanaugh, 2007

I have been teaching summer course in our master's program for years now and for the most part have found them to be the most enriching teaching experiences I have had. These are intense 8 hours a day, 5 days a week programs that typically go on for a month. [We are...

Another New Year’s card

We just created another New Year's Card / Video. Check it out: Shreya's Magic Touch [youtube width="425" height="355"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MOrRsXaFE3o[/youtube]

Affective feedback from computers (Mishra, 2006)

Mishra, P. (2006). Affective Feedback from Computers and its Effect on Perceived Ability and Affect: A Test of the Computers as Social Actor Hypothesis. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia. 15 (1), pp. 107-131. Abstract: We report an experimental study...

It takes 10,000 hours

A quote in a NYTimes article caught my attention According to sports scientists, the most significant predictor of an athlete’s skill is the time spent in practice. “It’s not just genetics,” says Jean Côté, the director of the School of Kinesiology and Health Studies...

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *