Slipping into uncanny valley

by | Tuesday, May 06, 2008

MindHacks has a great post related to some of my previous postings about anthropomorphizing interactive artifacts (see here and here) – just that this time these artifacts under discussion are robots. As it turns out, sometime too much similarity between humans and robots can really mess things up in our mind – and we fall into, what has been called, uncanny valley.

A good example of uncanny valley is how strange and disturbing movies like Polar Express (that use sophisticated motion capture technologies) look like – mainly because they are close to human actions but not identical with them. Contrast that with how easily we can see personality and character in a set of dancing squiggles that make up cartoon movies. My favorite example of uncanny valley comes from Toy Story 2, where the toys look just perfect, when they move and speak. The illusion holds – and the characters come “alive,” in powerful, emotionally valid ways. However, the illusion collapses the moment they bring in a human (be it Andy or the “Chicken Man” or worst of all a little baby). Somehow our brains are unwilling to accept even minor lapses from full fidelity when it comes to humans.

For some reason, a mantra of computer graphic artists (whether they work in movies or in game design) is higher and higher fidelity. What is interesting is that by this they may actually be making things look less realistic.

In contrast, people see intentionality, agency and personality everywhere. This was demonstrated most cleverly by two psychologists Heider and Simmel back in 1949. They showed subjects simple film animations, mostly of geometric shapes, and asked them to describe what they saw. Most participants developed complex stories about these shapes, bringing in higher order constructs such as love and villainy to explain what they saw. If this seems really weird, take a look at one of these movies (here is a direct link to the movie, and a link to the page that describes this and other experiments). It is difficult not to see “narratives” in these rather abstract animations.

Anyway, the MindHacks post (Uncanny Valley of the Dolls, what a great title) provides links to online videos and research publications of Human-Computer Interaction researcher Karl MacDorman. This is a far cry from the little animate geometric shapes… and as fascinating.

In my 917 class, we spend quite some time discussing our relationship to artifacts. Interactive artifacts are interesting boundary objects that exist in between the artifactual and intentional worlds. It is no wonder our psychology gets all messed up when we have to interact with things like this. And these boundary objects are increasingly becoming part of the world we live in – whether they be robotic toys, or vacuum cleaners). As an educator, I often wonder how continuous interaction with such artifacts influences the way we think about artifacts, and about humans.

One of my research studies (with Andrea Francis) looked at how children respond to anthropomorphic toys.

A few randomly selected blog posts…

The intangibles of teaching

Jim Garrison and A. G. Rud have a wonderful article on TCRecord on Reverence in Classroom Teaching. Though, reverence may be "too exalted a word to associate with the practical and often mundane activities of teaching," it appears to me that ignoring these deeper...

How artists work

An interesting (and growing) collection of "habits, rituals and small (and occasionally big) methods people and teams use to get their work done. And in the specific anecdotes and the way people describe their own relationship to their own work." Kind of cool and...

The gift that keeps on giving, or Why I love the web

I recently received this email: Dear Mr. Mishra, I am currently working on a poetry research project for school, and one of the requirements is researching five different poets. While looking for people who wrote palindromic poetry, I found your website and decided to...

TPACK & Philosophy

TPACK & Philosophy

I often receive emails about the TPACK framework and even though I have not worked in that space for a while, I do feel obligated to respond. That said, I usually do not feel the need to document my responses. Once in a while, however, I get a question that demands a...

Sketching MSUrbanSTEM

Sketching MSUrbanSTEM

I have been playing with my iPad a bit, experimenting with sketching and drawing apps for a few months now. I have realized that it is important to give yourself a task, a clear end-goal to work towards if I had to get anywhere. So with that in mind, I decided to...

Photos from the AT&T Award ceremony

The award ceremony for the 2008 MSU-AT&T Instructional Technology Awards was last Friday. I drove back from Purdue in time to be there - mainly because I wanted to hear how people would respond to our faux radio interview 🙂 The event went off well, and people...

The Innocent

I first read Ian McEwan many years ago (in the 80's I think) when he wrote grim and macabre novels and short stories, full of strange dark humor. I found him somewhat interesting but not enough to seek out his books. And then, years later, this past fall I read...

Ask-ing Cuil questions of Google

How do we evaluate a search engine? Chris Wilson attempts to answer this question (with help from the crowd) in his article on Slate "How To Talk to a Search Engine: Three queries to help decide if Google or Cuil or Ask is right for you?" The three search items he...

Happy New Year

For the past couple of years now, our family has been creating new year's greetings using stop-motion video. This year was no exception. Here it is (on Vimeo) http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=18164777 A very wonderful holidays and a very happy new year to all of...

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *