Blast from the past: Technology, representation & cognition

by | Sunday, February 11, 2024

I published my first academic article (a book chapter) in 1996 when I was a PhD student at the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign. My the advisor, Rand Spiro, had been invited to write a chapter for an edited book and asked me if I would be willing to join him and his colleague (Paul Feltovich) in writing it. I, of course, jumped at the opportunity.

Given that this paper was written almost 30 years ago it is amazing just how relevant some of the ideas explored in that paper are, even today. In fact I have found myself citing it and quoting from it quite a bit over the past year or so. To be fair, not all of the ideas we discussed in this paper have dated well, but I do find myself going back to the first half of the paper for inspiration and insight.

Sadly, however, given that it was a chapter in an academic book (and one I assume is now out of print) the chances of someone finding the paper is quite low. Moreover, I realized (to my surprise) that I had not shared the paper on my website, so this post is an attempt to redress this gap. A complete citation and link to a scanned PDF is given below:

Mishra, P., Spiro, R. J. & Feltovich, P. (1996) Technology, representation & cognition. In von Oostendorp, H. (Ed.) Cognitive aspects of electronic text processing. (pp. 287-306). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

The main argument made in the chapter (and the part that still holds relevance today) is that technologies have particular and specific attributes (often invisible to users of the technology) that prefigure or engender different mind-sets or ways of thinking. This question, of course, one that I have tried to grapple with in the new context we live in today—that of a world of generative AI. What IS the true nature of generative AI? What does that mean for us, as individuals and as a society? As I have argued, without understanding the true nature of this technology we will not be able to understand what it does for us, and as importantly, what it takes away.

I will be writing more about this in upcoming blog posts.

Topics related to this post: Worth Reading

A few randomly selected blog posts…

STEM Futures at AAAS

STEM Futures at AAAS

ASU recently hosted, what is known as, the world's largest scientific gathering, the annual conference of the American Association of the Advancement of Science. As as part of this conference I was invited, along with Ariel Anbar and Trina Davis, to talk about our...

Alien Games

A journal article on games and gender, that has been years in the making is finally going to see the light of day! The complete reference and abstract can be found below. Drop me an email if you would like a copy. Heeter, C., Egidio, R., Mishra, P., Winn, B., & Winn,...

New ambigram, Algebra

I have been thinking about the relationship between ambigrams and mathematics - instigated in no small part by an email conversation with Gaurav Bhatnagar. That inspired me to create ambigrams of words that are related to mathematics. There are a few ideas percolating...

TE150 wins MSU-AT&T Award

Matt Koehler and I just arrived in New York, 3 hours late, checked into our hotel, paid 14.95 for internet - and guess what it was all worth it. One of the first emails I had received informed us that we had won the 2008 MSU-AT&T Instructional Technology Awards...

Defense against the dark arts in the Sydney Morning Herald

Defense against the dark arts in the Sydney Morning Herald

I was in Sydney recently to present a keynote at the MITE conference. I spoke there about some issues that have been concerning me for a while—what I like to call the "dark arts" of digital technologies. After the conference I had a wide-ranging interview with Jordan...

Using eclipses to see

Let me start with two questions: First, what is the shape of the Earth? And two, what shapes does the sun cast on the ground when filtered through the leaves of a tree? Of course we know the answer to the first question. The pictures from space show clearly this...

Affective feedback from computers (Mishra, 2006)

Mishra, P. (2006). Affective Feedback from Computers and its Effect on Perceived Ability and Affect: A Test of the Computers as Social Actor Hypothesis. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia. 15 (1), pp. 107-131. Abstract: We report an experimental study...

Yet another periodic table…

The ongoing saga of mis-representing the periodic table for any darned list of objects continues... Here is a new one sent in by my friend and colleague Patrick Dickson: A periodic table of Typefaces. Now I won't beat a dead horse here, (Nashworld has a great posting...

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *