Update IV

by | Monday, October 06, 2008

Chris from Creativity Portal dropped off a “strong” message to me on my website (see it here).

Just a couple of points. First, I have not received the email they sent me (I do not question the fact that they did send it) – just that I did not receive it. I checked my log again and did not find it.

Second, the comment suggests that I have been in a “rush to judgment” and have assumed that everybody is in this “plagiaristic conspiracy ring.” That is just not true. I have not blamed anybody but David Jiles Ph.D. and even there I have asked him to offer his take on what has happened.

Third, they say that their response was “pretty good for an average dot com Web community not in the business of peer-reviewing articles for professional publications (nor expected).” I am not sure about that. I think in the age of Google the least we can do is check up on this person – get a copy of their vita or whatever. Look at their profile on Linked in? Was that done? I don’t know.

But that is neither here nor there.

What is important in all this is what is NOT being talked about. In all this I see no concern on the part of the “average dot com Web community” to the rights of the the Root-Bernsteins.’ Their work has been completely ripped off and these people have been (inadvertently or whatever) party to this. Yet, I hear no one speak to how their life’s work has been stolen.

So I must say that the sentence, that I “have done a fine job in quickly naming and shaming innocent parties to the ‘deception’ of this author” is the one that bothered me somewhat. It is kind of ironic that protecting the rights of content creators is seen as being an unkind act.

I am sorry I did not receive the note from Chris at Creativity Portal. I would have quickly noted that they were acting on this. Let this be a statement to that effect. That is indeed the fair thing to do.

Topics related to this post: Creativity | Crime | Personal | Plagiarism

A few randomly selected blog posts…

What is TPACK? Updated article

There are some articles that sink without a trace. There are others like our 2006 TCRecord article introducing the TPACK framework that continues to be cited... and then there are some that keep getting published over and over (albeit in an updated manner). Here is...

Games, claims, genres & learning

Foster, A. N., Mishra, P. (in press). Games, claims, genres & learning. In R. E. Ferdig (Ed.), Handbook of research on effective electronic gaming in education. [PDF document] Abstract: We offer a framework for conducting research on games for learning. Building on a...

Happy New Year, from the College of Education, MSU

The college of Education at Michigan State University just came out with a video titled Year in Review. You can see the video below. I would like to point out that a couple of projects I am involved with made it into the video. They include the project with the Azim...

Textbooks meet Bittorrent!

NYTimes article on how publishers are responding to the advent of peer-to-peer sharing of textbook files. Check out First It Was Song Downloads. Now It’s Organic Chemistry.

Tools “R” Us: When objects become you

Tools “R” Us: When objects become you

Danah Henriksen shared an article with me recently “When objects become extensions of you.” It is an interesting piece arguing that “Whether they are tools, toys, or mirror reflections, external objects temporarily become part of who we are all the time.” Essentially,...

TPACK in Spanish

TPACK in Spanish

Back in 2013 we (Koehler, Mishra and Cain) published an updated version of an article on TPACK. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education (193)3, 13-20. This article was...

Call: Failure and Creative Risk in Technology-Enhanced Learning

Call: Failure and Creative Risk in Technology-Enhanced Learning

I am excited to announce a call for articles on Failure and Creative Risk in Technology-Enhanced Learning for a special section in the journal Tech Trends, edited by Danah Henriksen, Punya Mishra, Edwin Creely, and Michael Henderson. You can download the the...

Reading Obama, and getting it right!

I rarely if ever blog about politics - though I follow it avidly. I spend large parts of my day reading the news, keeping up with what is going on. Most of my news gathering happens online (the little TV I watch, usually the Daily Show, also happens online). And it is...

Post-lunch session: Nancy Law

The last session of the day was led by Dr. Nancy Law, Director, Centre for Information Technology in Education, University of Hong Kong. Her session was titled Using ICT to support learning: lessons learnt from international studies I met Dr. Law at SITE 2008 and then...

1 Comment

  1. Creativity Portal

    “I am sorry I did not receive the note from Chris at Creativity Portal. I would have quickly noted that they were acting on this. Let this be a statement to that effect. That is indeed the fair thing to do.”

    Punya,

    Thank you for that acknowledgment (check your bulk folder, it was sent twice). We have spent many hours today on this issue retooling our submission guidelines and processes and crafting a message we’ll communicate to our community on the seriousness of plagiarism.

    No, protecting the rights of content creators is not an unkind act. It is a serious priority of ours, and unfortunately, in this instance the creator’s content came from an offline book we have not read. Didn’t someone tell you that it was from a book also? How else would you have known?

    Plagiarism and copyright issues are topics we will continue to talk about and enforce at our Web site. If you “see no concern on the part of the ‘average dot com Web community’ to the rights of the the Root-Bernsteins” or any other works, then perhaps you aren’t looking deep enough. It is a huge concern of ours and of many of our partners. On every page of our Web site (header), for example, we have a copyright link that goes to this page:

    http://www.creativity-portal.com/main/copyright.html

    Our article submission page also stresses this information and has been updated today:

    http://www.creativity-portal.com/main/submit.article.html

    Our Terms of Use page:

    http://www.creativity-portal.com/main/privacy.html

    Subscribers to our newsletter will also tell you that we have stressed this information for years and have spent many hours contacting other Web site and blog publishers to remove our own content from their sites that they’ve lifted without permission and attribution. I personally know what it feels like to see others profiting from my work, so I’m highly keyed into this and agree these things need to be called out.

    My message had more to do with allowing these processes (of removing offending content) to take place in realistic time frames, which is more than one business day (be happy you didn’t have to fill out one of these DMCA forms which I had to do and sign with my own blood to get one of my personal projects removed from a ‘free web hosting’ site.)

    We agree that these issues need to be talked about and enforced. Please do give credit to Web publishers who are concerned, who are upholding these standards, and who are taking action when something like this comes to their attention.

    Thank you again for alerting us to this case and for allowing us to set the record straight.

    …and please do enjoy the cool weather and changing leaves.

    Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *