Creativity & AI: On the Perkins Platform Podcast

by | Monday, February 23, 2026

I recently joined Dr. Brian K. Perkins on the Perkins Platform Podcast for a conversation that gets at a question I think about a lot: when AI is part of the process, what actually qualifies as your work? In our conversation we pushed back on the tired extremes and focused on something more interesting: how AI reshapes what creativity can be, not just what it produces.

“There’s a danger in both extremes: the utopian idea that AI will democratize creativity completely, and the dystopian fear that it will eliminate human contribution. The truth is more nuanced. AI expands possibilities, but it does not remove the need for human insight.”

One of the threads I kept returning to is the idea of caring. AI can generate, remix, and produce at scale, but it doesn’t care. It has no stake in the outcome, no lived experience shaping its choices, no sense of what matters and why. Creativity, at its core, has always required caring. It requires intention. It requires someone who looks at a set of possibilities and says: this one, for this reason, for this person, in this moment.

“AI doesn’t arrive with intention, values, or lived experience. It can remix patterns at scale, but it doesn’t care. Humans care. And that caring — that sense of purpose and context — is what transforms output into meaningful work.”

That’s why human judgment isn’t just a nice-to-have in an AI-assisted creative process. It’s the whole thing. The prompting, the refining, the discarding, the shaping: that is the creative act. And that’s still entirely yours.

“What qualifies as ‘your’ work is not just who typed the words or generated the image. It’s who shaped the intention, who evaluated the outcomes, and who integrated the result into a broader human context.”

This also fits into a longer historical arc. The camera didn’t eliminate art, it changed painting. Word processors didn’t eliminate writing, they changed revision. AI is part of that same story. It shifts where the effort lives, but it doesn’t remove the need for a human at the center of it.

You can listen to the full, rich, fun and wide-ranging conversation below.

Topics related to this post: Worth Reading

A few randomly selected blog posts…

Designing shared spaces, one example

Design is about engineering. It is about art. And most importantly it is about the psychology of individuals and groups and their interactions with artifacts. I am always on the lookout for examples of good (or bad) design. Sadly I too often come across the latter...

Bollywood meets Guitar Hero

Over the Christmas break my daughter and three of her friends got together to make a music video. The idea was simple, what if there were a version of Guita Hero (Sitar Hero anyone?) for Bollywood songs. Out of this idea emerged a 5+ minute long music video - with a...

Psychology and Coercive Interrogation, the history

In the context of my previous posting, here is an article that provides "a brief historical summary of the research into forms of coercive persuasion, primarily sensory deprivation, conducted 35 to 50 years ago, in which psychologists, psychoanalysts, and...

The Stranger Who Changed My Life: A tribute to Bill Atkinson

The Stranger Who Changed My Life: A tribute to Bill Atkinson

Bill Atkinson was someone I had never met. But he changed my life. I learned of Bill's passing a couple of days ago. It was not that I had thought about Bill a lot but the news of his death brought back memories and a recognition of the critical role he had played in...

The art of science

I have always been interested in what lies at the intersection of science and art. There are of course many different ways of looking at this. There is the idea of scientific creativity being both similar to and different from artistic creativity. And then there is...

Improv here, there, everywhere…

A few months ago I wrote about Professor R. K. Joshi (here and here). He was, as I said in the piece, maybe the single greatest influence on my role as a teacher. I had mentioned that R.K. loved absurdity and play. I was reminded of this when I read about this group...

TPACK Newsletter 8 (Feb 2011)

TPACK Newsletter, Issue #8: February 2011 Welcome to a new year and to the eighth edition of the TPACK Newsletter! Please forgive our long delay in getting this “mega-issue” to you. We’ll do a lot of “catching up” with what has been happening with TPACK worldwide in...

Education in an evolutionary perspective

I just discovered Peter O. Gray's blog on Psychology Today, titled Freedom to Learn: The roles of play and curiosity as foundations for learning. This is an awesome blog and really worth reading. Here are two of his posts that I strongly recommend. The first states...

Master’s course wins ATT Award

Just got the news from Carrie Albin, Outreach Coordinator of our Educational Technology Certificate Program (which is part of our Master's in Educational Technology program) that our CEP810 (Teaching for Understanding with Computers) course earned first place in the...

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *