The Conscious Suspension of Belief: Getting Smart about Human-AI Interaction

by | Sunday, October 13, 2024

A classic tale of early cinema recounts the 1896 Paris screening of the Lumière brothers’ “L’arrivée d’un train en gare de La Ciotat” (Arrival of a Train at La Ciotat Station). According to popular accounts, some viewers reportedly reacted with panic to the realistic image of an approaching train, scrambling to escape what they perceived as a real locomotive bearing down upon them. The original video is embedded below.

It’s a captivating story, one that’s been repeated countless times to illustrate the power of cinema. There’s just one problem, this probably never happened. Recent historical research suggests this tale of terrified moviegoers is likely an urban legend, a colorful exaggeration that’s taken on a life of its own.

This historical anecdote, myth and all, emphasizes a specific paradox about media representations—they are both real and unreal. And our job when confronted by them is to ignore their unreality and embrace it as if it were true. For instance in the case of the Lumiere brothers film, viewers knew, on a rational level, that they were watching a film projection. Yet their perceptual systems responded as if a three-dimensional object was hurtling towards them.

While the extreme reaction to the Lumière brothers’ film may be exaggerated, it illustrates a fundamental aspect of how we engage with media. This tension between knowing something is not real and yet responding as if it were, has long fascinated scholars and creators alike. One of the first people to try to explain this phenomenon was the English poet, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.

Back in 1817, Coleridge argued, specifically in the context of reading, readers had to deliberately set aside their skepticism in order to immerse themselves in the world of fiction and literature. He called this process a ‘willing suspension of disbelief.’

This is important to understand since this duality of representation – being both real and unreal – is inherent in all media depictions and representations. Picasso’s bull series (below) illustrates this brilliantly, as does Magritte’s famous “The Treachery of Images” with its painted pipe captioned “Ceci n’est pas une pipe” (This is not a pipe). We see the bull in Picasso’s drawings, even though it becomes more and more abstract in its depiction.

And we see the pipe in Magritte’s painting as being a pipe even though we know it is just a painting. As in the image below which suggests that the pipe is real but rather, this is NOT a painting by Magritte. This is the tyranny of images (which incidentally was the title of Magritte’s painting of a not-pipe!

“This is not a painting by Magritte.” Design by Punya Mishra based on a painting Magritte

In each case (whether Picasso’s geometric bull, or Magritte’s pipe), our minds bridge the gap between representation and reality. We see a bull, a pipe – yet we know they’re just marks on canvas (or on screen). This cognitive flexibility, perceiving the real in the unreal, is both a remarkable feature of human perception and a potential pitfall in our increasingly mediated world.

The Myth of Suspended Disbelief

Most discussions of our response to media take the idea of “willing suspension of disbelief” as being central to how we respond to media. Media representations (paintings, films, video games) are all unreal and we consciously choose to “suspend our disbelief” when engaging with them.

The fundamental idea here is that belief is easy, disbelief requires cognitive effort, and we will somewhat automatically go with the one that requires less effort.

The Default of Belief: Insights from Cognitive Science

In his seminal work “Thinking, Fast and Slow,” Daniel Kahneman introduces us to two systems of thought. System 1 is fast, intuitive, and emotional, operating automatically and quickly, with little or no effort. System 2, on the other hand, is slower, more deliberative, and logical, allocating attention to effortful mental activities that demand it, including complex computations.

Our tendency to believe is a System 1 process. It’s quick, automatic, and requires little mental effort. Skepticism, on the other hand, is a System 2 process. It’s slow, deliberate, and cognitively demanding.

Consider our reaction to a well-crafted film. System 1 allows us to become emotionally invested in the characters and story, laughing or crying along with the events on screen. This happens automatically and effortlessly. A good example is the Hider and Simmel abstract videos I had mentioned in a previous post. System 2, however, is what allows us to step back and critically analyze the film’s themes, cinematography, or historical accuracy. This requires conscious effort and doesn’t happen unless we deliberately engage in it.

But what happens when these cognitive shortcuts—our System 1 processes—encounter stimuli they weren’t evolved to handle? In my previous post (Beavers, Brains, & Chatbots: Cognitive Illusions in the age of AI) I had explained that beavers, nature’s adorable engineer, have been programmed (by blind evolution) to build dams at the SOUND of running water. This made perfect sense in a world without tape recorders. But not so much when scientists started creeping around in the undergrowth placing recorders to track the behavior of these animals, the beavers were fooled.

And now we have generative AI.

Artificial Intelligence presents an even more complex challenge to our cognitive processes. Unlike traditional media or simple recordings, AI can actively respond and adapt to our inputs, creating an illusion of intelligence and understanding that’s far more convincing than any static medium. This dynamic interaction taps into our social instincts and cognitive biases in unprecedented ways, making it even harder for our System 1 thinking to distinguish between genuine intelligence and sophisticated simulation.

The AI Challenge: When Our Cognitive Shortcuts Fail Us

This interplay between representation and reality becomes exponentially more complex when we consider representations of the mind itself. Here, form and content become inextricably intertwined. Our engagement with AI exemplifies this conundrum – the only metaphors we have for artificial intelligence are mental ones, drawn from our understanding of human cognition. In a previous blog post, I explored this very issue, highlighting how our tendency to anthropomorphize AI stems (partly) from our limited conceptual toolkit. We describe AI systems in terms of “thinking,” “learning,” or “deciding,” not because these terms are necessarily accurate, but because that’s the only language we have at hand. This linguistic and conceptual limitation blurs the lines between artificial processes and human cognition, making our interactions with AI particularly messy and prone to misinterpretation.

In a recent blog post, I explored how our tendency to anthropomorphize extends to our interactions with AI. Just as we see faces in clouds or attribute personalities to our cars, we can’t help but see human-like qualities in AI systems that can engage in natural language conversations, remember context, and simulate creativity.

If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck… it most probably is a duck. At least that’s how our stone age brains function. It is almost like we don’t have a choice. We will anthropomorphize instinctively, almost compulsively. System 1 kicking in. Just as the beaver responds to recorded water sounds, we respond to artificial intelligence as if it were truly intelligent. Our logical brain knows it’s not sentient, yet at another level, we can’t help but interact with it as if it were.

The Fundamental Tension

Yet, we must acknowledge a fundamental tension in this endeavor. Just as films can still move us – make us laugh, cry, and inspire us to action – despite our knowledge that they’re merely flickering images on a screen, AI has the power to captivate us in similar ways. We may intellectually understand that we’re interacting with a complex algorithm or generative computer program, but emotionally, we can still find ourselves drawn in. We connect, we share, we react as if this software had feelings, beliefs, and desires.

This phenomenon is strikingly evident in recent studies on human-AI interactions. As I’ve discussed in a previous blog post (Turing’s Tricksters), people are revealing far more personal information to AI chatbots than one might expect. Users often disclose intimate details, seek emotional support, or share vulnerabilities with these AI systems, despite knowing they’re conversing with software.

This is the paradox we face: AI will continue to capture us in its web, even as we strive to maintain our critical faculties. But it’s crucial to remember that this web is, in large part, of our own creation. It’s a reflection of our innate tendencies, our cognitive biases, and our deeply human need to connect and find meaning. It is important to hold these two realities in balance.

However, I worry that despite our best efforts, we may not be able to fully resist this pull. Our tendency to anthropomorphize and our default state of belief are deeply rooted in our evolutionary history. They cannot be changed at the flick of a switch. Just as we can’t help but see faces in clouds or flinch at sudden movements on a movie screen, we may find ourselves inexorably drawn into emotional engagement with AI, even as our rational minds protest.

A few randomly selected blog posts…

Coding with ChatGPT3: On gaining a superpower

Coding with ChatGPT3: On gaining a superpower

I had heard that ChatGPT3 could help with writing code and just hadn't much time to play with it. Part of the reason is that I haven't really coded in almost 2 decades (maybe more) so was somewhat hesitant to jump in. But again I kept reading of people doing amazing...

Education & the Rise of AI Influencers

Education & the Rise of AI Influencers

I have been thinking hard about the nature of generative AI, what sets it apart from other technologies that have come in the past. It seems to me there are two key factors. The first is its ability to engage in dialogue, in natural language and the second are its...

TPACK in context: Call for papers

TPACK in context: Call for papers

Technology integration in teaching is deeply rooted in specific contexts. One could argue that contextual knowledge is of critical importance to teachers and the absence of it would limit, in significant ways, their effectiveness and success as an educators seeking to...

What is this thing called text?

Steven Johnson has a great essay on the future of text title: The Glass Box And The Commonplace Book. I recommend reading the full thing but here is a quote that sort of captures his vision (though there is more, much more). Here is a great quote: WHEN TEXT IS free to...

Open source conferencing

Just found out about Dimdim (bad name!) from Manas Chakrabarti's blog, At Any Rate. Dimdim is an opensource, free web conferencing service where you can share your desktop, show slides, collaborate, chat, talk and broadcast via webcam with absolutely no download...

Announcing: Short film competition, cool prize for winner!!

Those of you who have been following this blog know, over the past few months I have made a few short videos with my kids. The ones I am most proud of are a set of three made around the words Explore, Create, Share (you can see them all here). There were great fun to...

Happy Thanksgiving

Happy Thanksgiving

A new design for my favorite holiday of the year. See animated version below. Enjoy Previous designs can be found here and here.

Math Concepts by Gaurav Bhatnagar

Gaurav Bhatnagar is one of my oldest friends - going back to 8th grade in Modern School, Barakhamba Road. He recently published his first book on Mathematics for kids, titled, Get Smart: Maths Concepts, published by Penguin India. The book also has an associated blog...

Jugaad, India-genous creativity

Jugaad is a Hindi word which does not have a straight forward equivalent in English. I guess the closest phrase I would say would be "situational or indigenous creativity," the ability to make do creatively with the tools/resources one has at hand. On Jugadu.com I...

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *