Complicating the idea of Design Thinking (in Education)

by | Sunday, September 11, 2022

“Design thinking” is one of the latest buzzwords in education. Proponents argue that design thinking is a tried and tested process for fostering innovation in education while critics suggest that it is the latest fad to sweep through, and will, like others before it, fade away. Irrespective of where one stands on this issue, because educational institutions and structures are human-created, they are amenable to design (and redesign). Thus, design thinking may be a useful tool for educators to explore. There is, however, less clarity on how design thinking unfolds in complex educational contexts.

In this article (titled: Complicating Design Thinking in Education: A University-School District Partnership to Design a School for the Future coauthored with Melissa Warr, Ben Scragg, Jeanne Powers, & Lok-Sze Wong) we ground our argument in an analysis of a specific case: a university-school district partnership that attempted to use a design thinking process to create a new model of school. You can read the complete (pre-press version) of the paper below – though I excerpt a few key ideas (about models of design thinking) in the next few paragraphs.

Firstly, we argue that most design thinking process models fail to adequately describe the richness, unpredictability, and messiness of design work as it plays out in the real world. We suggest that it may make sense, given the complex nature of the phenomena under study, that design researchers be open to multiple theories and perspectives to better understand design in education. More importantly, using more than one approach provides a deeper and more nuanced view of design.

In particular, we argue that there are two different ways of conceptualizing design—a distinction that is often overlooked. The first is through the lens of process models, such as the d.school model or the double diamond model (IDEO design thinking, n.d.). These models describe design as a process that includes a series of steps or stages and focus on how design happens.

Process Models of Design

In contrast to process models are what we call domain models, which identify the space or domain within which design occurs (e.g., Buchanan, 2019; Golsby-Smith, 1996; Warr et al., 2020). Domain models offer ways to think and talk about design in terms of where design occurs. These two forms of design thinking models (process and domain) provide contrasting lenses through which to understand design.

Domain Models
The 5 spaces for design in education

In brief, we argue that design is a complex human activity and any attempt to capture it through abstracted representations (whether process models or domain models) is doomed to fail. That is not to say that these models are not useful. We suggest that it is by combining these two models—one focused on a collaborative process of understanding and redefining problems and solutions, and the other supporting a systemic perspective for thinking and talking about what is designed and the interactions across and external to the design process—we can develop a more nuanced understanding of design in education and support effective design in educational spaces.

Warr, M., Mishra, P., Scragg, B., Powers, J., & Wong, L-S. (2022). Complicating Design Thinking in Education: A University-School District Partnership to Design and School for the Future. In Sanzo, K. L. & Scribner, J. P. (Eds.), Design Thinking: Research, Innovation, and Implementation. Information Age Publishing.

Abstract: In this chapter, we apply two types of design models (process and domain) in an analysis of a university-school district design partnership. Design thinking process models outline how to design, while design domain models illustrate what is designed and the interactions of multiple types of designs. A design team from the university led monthly sessions with a group of stakeholders from the school district to design a new school model. Although the design team attempted to follow a design thinking process, the models describing design thinking failed to reflect the complexities of what occurred. We outline four complexities of the design partnership: finding the problem is the biggest problem, ideation is not just for finding potential solutions, design does not occur in a vacuum, and designing systems cannot be done piecemeal. We consider each from the lens of design process models and design domain models. Using the two lenses together enriched our understanding of the nuances and complexities of multi- stakeholder design in education.

A few randomly selected blog posts…

Happy Diwali

Happy Diwali  2010 Readers of this blog know that every year I provide a link to the same interactive Diwali eCard. Why change anything this year? So follow the link below, turn your volume way up,  and remember to click on the sky above the Taj Mahal for some...

Gary Marks, Lifetime achievement award

Gary Marks is the director/founder of the Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)and also the Executive Officer of the Society of Information Technology in Teacher Education (SITE). As a part of the 20th anniversary celebrations of SITE, Gary...

Measuring what matters: A convening

Measuring what matters: A convening

All of us involved in social design (and I include education in among those as well) ask ourselves, or are asked this question: How do we measure the impact of the work we do? This begs the question, why measure in the first place? Lord Kelvin, one of the greatest...

3 super-short stories

3 super-short stories

Students in my EDT180 class spent some time yesterday writing short stories. Super short stories, trying to tell a complete story in just 55 words! As it turns this (55 Fiction) is actually a thing – as a simple google search will reveal. Seeing my students engage in...

Ideas are cool

My colleague and friend David Wong has this cool idea, about making ideas cool. Actually, he has been espousing these ideas for a while now (check out his scholarly publications, in particular The Rebirth of Cool [Word doc]). But now this academic has stepped out of...

Creativity, Technology & Teacher Education, Call for papers

We (Punya Mishra and Danah Henriksen, faculty at Michigan State University) are currently planning a special issue for the Journal of Teacher Education and Technology, on the topic of creativity. At the moment, we are looking for brief abstract submissions from...

Blast from the past: Technology, representation & cognition

Blast from the past: Technology, representation & cognition

I published my first academic article (a book chapter) in 1996 when I was a PhD student at the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign. My the advisor, Rand Spiro, had been invited to write a chapter for an edited book and asked me if I would be willing to join him...

I can’t believe they patented that!

I just came across Inventor's Spot, a website that showcases inventions and innovations from around the world. They claim to be "the most popular invention website in the world." Be that as it may, this a site that I think I would find extremely useful in my 817 and...

New ambigram, Algebra

I have been thinking about the relationship between ambigrams and mathematics - instigated in no small part by an email conversation with Gaurav Bhatnagar. That inspired me to create ambigrams of words that are related to mathematics. There are a few ideas percolating...

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *