Peer review in the science classroom

by | Tuesday, November 20, 2018

Fig. 1: Header image. Credits: Illustration by Punya Mishra. License CC-BY-NC.

The scientific method is a myth.

In more ways than one.

Typically in school you are taught that the scientific method consists of making observations, developing hypotheses, testing them by collecting data and then accepting, rejecting or modifying the hypotheses. Through this process we develop new laws and theories to understand and explain the world.

We all understand that this is a simplistic description—one that misses the human side of science, the messiness of actual practice, and the unique grounded practices of different scientific disciplines.

I argue that there is another fundamental aspect of doing science that these criticisms miss—and that is the rhetorical nature of science. In other words, it is realizing that at the heart of the scientific method is the process of convincing others of the rightness of our point of view. That is one of the key reasons why we jump through the hoops of double-blind experimental design; why we develop better tools to measure phenomena and so on… essentially to protect our ideas from criticism from others.

This is the heart of blind peer review so that our arguments can be poked and prodded by others and through that we develop more convincing theories and understanding.

This aspect of the scientific method does not receive enough attention in the science classroom.

Our new article addresses how this idea of peer review can be brought into the classroom. This article was published in iWonder: Rediscovering School Science, a journal for middle school science teachers published by the Azim Premji University. This article is part of a series I have been (co)writing over the past few years.

Previous articles in this series can be found here, the latest issue can be found here or just our article is linked to below.

Close, K., Bowers, N., Mehta, R., Mishra, P., & J. Bryan Henderson. Students as teachers: How science teachers can collaborate with their students using peer instruction. iWonder, (5). p. 24-28.

Abstract: This article explores peer instruction in the science classroom. The authors use research in science education to illustrate, practically, how teachers can work with their students to increase learning using peer instruction.

A new challenge I took up in this series was creating the illustrations that go with the articles. I have become increasingly aware of my limitations as an artist but it has been great fun. A heartfelt thanks to Chitra Ravi and Ramgopal Vallath editors of iWonder for giving me/us this opportunity. One of the illustrations I created for this article is at the top of the page and the rest are given below. 

Learning is Powerful: Quote Fig 2. Learning is least useful when it is private and hidden, it is most powerful when it becomes public and communal (Lee Shulman). Illustration by Punya Mishra. License CC-BY-NC.

Peer instruction processFig 3. A diagram of the 7 steps in the peer-instruction process. Illustration by Punya Mishra. License CC-BY-NC.

Fig. 4 (a): Students when faced with a problem work in isolation with little knowledge of each other’s understanding. Illustration by Punya Mishra. License CC-BY-NC.

Fig. 4 (b): By sharing each other’s solutions students realize that their perspectives, frameworks, and understanding differ from each other. Illustration by Punya Mishra. License CC-BY-NC.

Fig. 4 (c): In attempting to convince each other of the correctness of their solution, students have to explain their logic and perspective on attacking the problem at hand. Illustration by Punya Mishra. License CC-BY-NC.

Fig. 4 (d): Through explaining their logic the students have a higher probability of developing a correct shared understanding of the problem. Illustration by Punya Mishra. License CC-BY-NC.

A few randomly selected blog posts…

TPACK Newsletters (#28, #29 & 30)

TPACK Newsletters (#28, #29 & 30)

In the rush of summer and the move to Arizona I missed posting #28 and #29 of the TPACK newsletter, and before I knew it, #30  was here as well. Well here are links to the PDFs of all three newsletters Newsletter 28: May 2016 (pdf)Newsletter 29: July 2016...

Good-Evil Ambigram in Pub Med!

Good-Evil Ambigram in Pub Med!

My Good-Evil oscillation ambigram design is easily one of my most popular designs - having made it to multiple publications, websites, covers of magazines, on the TV Show Brain Games... and now it has made its way into a medical research journal Frontiers of...

Happy 2009, a stop motion movie

Soham, Shreya and I spent this afternoon making a stop-motion animation new year's card. Check it out... http://www.youtube.com/embed/7kw_icNKI44 Have a great 2009!

Of garbage cans and psychological media

This has been a day of sad news from Stanford University. I blogged about the passing away of Dr. Nalini Ambady (see blog post here). I will digress a bit before I describe the second piece of news because the connection to me (and my work) is much more salient. Back...

Games & Learning, an analysis

TCRecord has an interesting essay on the role of games and learning, by Alexander, Eaton & Egan, titled: Cracking the code of electronic games: Some lessons for educators. As they say, "This is an analytic article that provides a description of an array of...

The degradation of Matt

A rumination on goofy sketches, the perils of reproduction as it plays out in a children's game, a B-list Hollywood movie, and botany textbooks I read when in high school, all leading up to some thoughts on the history of scientific illustration. If this sounds even...

Mishra & Girod (2006/2007)

Mishra, P., & Girod, M. (2006/2007). Designing learning through learning to design. The High School Journal. 90(1). 44 – 51. Reprinted in K. M. Cauley, & G. Pannozzo, (Eds.), Annual Edition: Educational Psychology 07/08. McGraw-Hill: NY. Abstract: This paper...

Going crazy with i-Image

In a previous post I had described David Wong's ideasarecool.com website and his idea of making i-Images. As David describes them, i-Images are "professional, provocative images that seize the viewer's attention and, more importantly, spark their imagination." Anyway,...

EduSummIT 2015: Summary Report

EDUsummIT 2015 (International Summit on ICT in Education) is a global knowledge building community of researchers, educational practitioners, and policy makers committed to supporting the effective integration of research and practice in the field of ICT in...

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *