Teaching to learning styles, what hogwash

by | Wednesday, December 16, 2009

There is an article in today’s Chronicle titled Matching Teaching Style to Learning Style May Not Help Students.

I have been somewhat skeptical of the learning styles literature for a while, not the least for hearing the phrase being bandied about without much thought. I have heard people claim without much evidence, that today’s kids are visual learners. I have heard a teacher say that as a consequence, that visual learners prefer reading text from a Powerpoint slide, rather than read it on a blackboard! (Those who know me that I am rarely at a loss for words, but that statement truly struck me dumb! In Wolfgang Pauli’s words, that statement was not even wrong.) I have also had students claim that they did not do well in a certain course because it did not match their learning style!

Anyway, the study reported in the article

… does not dispute the existence of learning styles. But it asserts that no one has ever proved that any particular style of instruction simultaneously helps students who have one learning style while also harming students who have a different learning style.

What does this non-finding mean for practitioners (teachers and professors)?

The article says that more important than matching learning style to teaching style may be matching teaching style with the content to be taught. Here’s a key quote:

What this means for instructors, Mr. Pashler says, is that they should not waste any time or energy trying to determine the composition of learning styles in their classrooms. (Are 50 percent of my students visual learners? Are 20 percent of them kinesthetic learners?)

Instead, teachers should worry about matching their instruction to the content they are teaching. Some concepts are best taught through hands-on work, some are best taught through lectures, and some are best taught through group discussions.

This makes so much sense to me. Understanding the deep relationship between content and pedagogy is at the heart of Shulman’s idea of pedagogical content knowledge, the forerunner of the TPACK framework.

A few randomly selected blog posts…

OofSI: The year that was

OofSI: The year that was

Every December the Office of Scholarship & Innovation (OofSI) team looks back at the year that was, to document and reflect on all that we have done, as well as to plan for the future. This information is then put together in a report that captures our successes...

Undo this

Wouldn't it be great if life came with an undo key-stroke-combination? Just a thought I threw out today during a meeting which led to a discussion of how this could be a great movie idea. Seems intriguing...

TPACK newsletter #5, Oct – Nov 09

TPACK Newsletter, Issue #5: October/November 2009 Welcome to the fifth edition of the TPACK Newsletter, now with 568 subscribers (representing a 15% increase during the last two months!), and appearing bimonthly between August and April. If you are not sure what TPACK...

Only one recipe…

I have been catching up on my reading of Slate and came across this gem of an article by Judith Shulevitz titled, The care and feeding of fiction. Shulevitz has written a quasi-review of James Wood's new book How fiction works and makes we want to read the book...

Rube Goldberg website

Just found out about this through a list-serv I am on. Very cool. Hema is a Dutch department store (started back in 1926 and has over 150 stores all over the Netherlands). Check out HEMA's product page... and just wait a couple of seconds and watch what happens. Don't...

Harvard Open Access update

An update to my previous posting regarding Harvard adopting a open access requirement to all it faculty. It seems that the proposal has been approved. See this news story on the Chronicle.com website. Stuart M. Shieber, a professor of computer science at Harvard who...

Rainbows in your backyard, how scary

We have been talking about misconceptions in my summer MAET classes and one of my students sent me this hilarious link. There is really nothing much to say... just see it for yourself. [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3qFdbUEq5s[/youtube] Another video that I...

The recurring cycle of hype and despair around ed tech

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. — George Santayana (1905, p. 284) The Atlantic has an article titled "Why tech still hasn't solved education's problems" focusing on the failed promise of MOOCs and asks the question Why has the promised...

The beauty of randomness

The beauty of randomness

I have always been intrigued by the idea of how truly random our lives really are. Seemingly minor events can trigger effects, rippling through our lives, effects becoming causes, leading to profound changes and transformations. Ray Bradbury's short...

10 Comments

  1. Mary Brown

    To Mary,

    You see it confusing because your reason “to be honest I haven’t got the time to investigate the learning styles of each and every student”.

    But i think this post serves as a call for this to make better education for our young generation. Why don’t we try to make change to make things better?

    Reply
  2. Mary

    Yes I think it’s quite confusing too. I frequently have larger classes (20+)and to be honest I haven’t got the time to investigate the learning styles of each and every student. I tend to create my learning/teaching materials to cater to a variety of sytles.

    Reply
  3. Claire Parker

    Great post! Not only your words but the pictures can say too. I do agree with you. It’s hard to go through the depth of content and pedagogy but it’s really needed

    Reply
  4. Susan Ireland

    yes I agree it’s very difficult to cater to different learning styles in a class of 20+ students. I find that I try to encorporate a variety of techniques into my teaching. If a student has an identifiable learning style then that is a bonus for me.

    Reply
  5. Dusty Dilchand

    I think some children do learn better in one way. For example, I remember learning better when there’s something to read. I don’t learn much during lectures. But I do believe more research has to done in regards to teaching style – I believe there’s more to it than what we currently know.

    Reply
  6. Patrick Gillespie

    I teach various levels of high school chemistry and physics. My students range from learning disabled to AP students. In any given class, there is a diverse grouping of learning styles, and I subscribe to using several different strategies for any given topic. From my experience, students do have learning styles that more effective for them as individuals- some do better with written word, some with lecture format, some doing lab work, some with simulations, some with problem solving. Trying to incorporate several approaches helps most, and doesn’t seem to hurt any. However, I think using only one strategy can leave some less effectively taught than others.

    Reply
  7. Jonathan Selbig

    As a lower elementary teacher, I would have to say that “learning styles” and “teaching styles” are what get my students and myself through the day. As a teacher, you have to be engaging for ALL students. Some students do learn differently than others, especially those Special Ed students who have a learning disability, are ADD/ADHD, or even the shy, abused, neglected child, or even the so-called “smart” child who is normally bored in the classroom. If we do not meet the needs and learning styles of ALL students, through various teaching styles, we are not creating a differentiated classroom where 25 students could learn 25 different ways, even though they are all learning the same content.

    Reply
  8. Mike Hasley

    Not only a great observation, but nicely written (short and to the point!)

    Reply
  9. Emily Stone

    Very interesting. It’s refreshing to hear this new perspective. The molecular structure example in the article is the most poignant part for me. I know I am a visual learner, but there are some times where only a hands-on or “act it out” approach will help me retain information. Also interesting how the benefits of teachers simply being more conscious of different learning styles (and corresponding instructional styles) may be the key.

    Reply
  10. Gaurav Bhatnagar

    What about left-brain, right-brain, whole-brain and half-brain kind of learning. Anyone has any non-results on it?

    Reply

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. The Henricus » Multiple Intelligences or Strategic Teaching? - [...] reminded me of an interesting post at Punya Mishra’s website about matching teaching styles to learning styles.  This is [...]

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *