Spore & learning about evolution

by | Friday, September 05, 2008

A NYTimes story about Spore, the new game / toy designed by Will Wright (Playing God, the Home Game) speaks about its connection to evolution. As the article says,

Mr. Wright and his publishers at Electronic Arts deserve all the credit they have received from some scientists merely for making a game about evolution (though it will be fascinating to see how the game fares among people who do not believe evolution is real).

This raises the interesting question as to whether this game can be used to actually teach evolutionary theory.

However, I am not sure just how much the game truly represents evolution as biologists think about it.

At a fundamental level the biggest stumbling block in learning about evolution is not the process – Darwin’s insight of random variation and selective retention is quite easy to understand cognitively. The challenge and difficulty that people face is in truly grasping the non-teleological nature of this process – the fact that it is not driven by a goal.

Spore on the other hand is driven by the choices made by the player. And it is here that it differs fundamentally from Darwinian evolution. I am reminded of a software program, Biomorphs, developed by evolution guru Richard Dawkins (that he included in his book The Blind Watchmaker). [Online versions of this game can be found here.] Even though Dawkins saw this game as an example of how initial conditions and randomness can lead to very different designs of two-dimensional creatures, critics of evolution argued that since the the user decided which shape would be the “seed” and which shape they would like this process to “lead to,” this software program actually made a case for Intelligent Design!

The same criticism can be labeled at Spore as well. And interestingly enough, Will Wright is the first to agree with this. In a previous NYTimes article (The Long Zoom) he said

I’ve had a few people ask me if I think Spore will help teach evolution, and the ironic thing is that, if anything, we’re teaching intelligent design.

In a series of previous postings I had raised the question of how does a technology become an educational technology (see here and here). It seems to me that a game such as Spore (or Dawkin’s creatures) needs the presence of an educated “other” (a teacher, a mentor, a parent, an expert) to highlight what parts match with evolutionary theory and which parts are fanciful creations of the game designers.

A few randomly selected blog posts…

Educational Technology @ MSU

The Educational Psychology and Educational Technology program at the College of Education at Michigan State University offers a variety of programs in educational technology. The College of Education is one of highest ranked colleges of education in the country (see...

Why Theory: Or the TPACK story

Why Theory: Or the TPACK story

Note: There are two key updates / correction to this post The first has to do with a couple of things that I either got wrong, or rushed over. More about that at Update on "The TPACK story" or "Oops!"The second has to do with an update to the diagram itself that came...

Wordle, McCain v.s. Obama

As I was playing with Wordle (see previous postings here and here) I realized that it could be used for political analysis. So here are John McCain and Barack Obama's acceptance speeches as a word-map. Can you without, my telling you so, figure out which is which? A...

Education in a pandemic: A crisis & opportunity

Education in a pandemic: A crisis & opportunity

Last year I was in Israel to present at the Meital Conference. When I was there I was interviewed by Lior Detal, the education correspondent for TheMarker - which led to an article in the magazine. Earlier this year, once the COVID crisis was in full swing, I was...

Blogging SETS: Morning session

I am trying to live blog the conference: Symposium on Education Technology in Schools: Converging for Innovation & Creativity [Full agenda here]. Let us see how far I can keep this up. August 20: Morning session: The pre-conference session has been about meeting old...

On picturing words, tech-mix an old school idea

Students in my CEP 818 (Creativity in Teaching and Learning) have been using digital photography to explore a variety of topics related to trans-disciplinary creativity. I hope to showcase some of their work on this blog once the semester gets over. In the meanwhile,...

Day 2 Morning session, Mishra & Light

I just completed my presentation Education Technology and Teacher Education, the TPACK framework. I think it went well, though you have to talk to ask the audience what they "really" think. I had been allocated 60 minutes for my talk - but Radha and I discussed...

The Allegory of the Cave

Plato's Allegory of the Cave (see Wikipedia entry) illustrates "our nature in its education and want of education." It is maybe one of the most famous allegories in literature and philosophy, a precursor to the kinds of mind-games (think brain in a vat) that...

The “O” in Obama

Steven Heller continues his series on political typography and branding with an interview with the design team that developed the now iconic symbol for the Obama campaign. Check out The "O" in Obama. Previous postings on this theme can be found here and here.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *