A long view of knowledge

by | Thursday, August 28, 2008

I should really visit Salon.com more often. Every time I go there I find something interesting, challenging and thought provoking. My recent foray there led me to a book review written by Laura Miller (The road to Wikipedia). Miller reviews “Reinventing Knowledge: From Alexandria to the Internet” by Ian McNeely and Lisa Wolverton. The book focuses on the “production, preservation and transmission” of knowledge and how that has changed over time, from an oral culture (such as in ancient Greece) to today’s world of the Internet and Web 2.0. Though I haven’t read the book the review has some interesting insights worth thinking about…

As the review says, the authors take a long and somewhat institutional view of knowledge arguing that it has been

… fundamentally reinvented fully six times in the history of the West. The six institutions that achieved these reinventions are the library, the monastery, the university, the “Republic of Letters,” the disciplines and the laboratory.

The review (and I am sure the book as well) is worth reading just to find out more about how the authors describe these six categories. One thing not mentioned in the review is that though these categories seem to appear one after the other, in historical and chronological terms, it is not that the advent of a new institutional frame led to disappearance of a prior one. Libraries continue to exist, as does the university – though the new institutions of knowledge redefine how we think about these the ones that came before. In a way this is similar to how the advent of TV did not replace the radio, but rather changed its role in our lives.

The authors describe these six institutions as doing four key things: decide what constitutes knowledge; how it should be organized for efficient access; how it could be taught to others; and finally, how it should be preserved for future generations.

There is a chicken or egg conundrum at the heart of discussion of technology, knowledge, and society. Was Chinese society about making exact copies (through rubbings of stone carvings) because of a belief in the authority of the text or the state or was it a belief in the authority of the state that led to this emphasis on making exact copies. Similarly, was the western idea of making written copies, that could be embellished, modified, annotated by readers/writers dependent on western ideas of autonomy and individualism or vice versa. Clearly these are questions that do not have clear answers and most probably the answer lies somewhere in a complex transaction between different agents (human, institutional and technological). It is however fascinating to see how this transaction plays out through history and across different cultures.

Interestingly enough, the authors do not feel that the Internet (despite all the hype to the contrary) is not a new reinvention of the institution of knowledge at par with the six they describe. A part of this be because they argue that the Internet’s multiple outlets for self expression

if anything, make the pursuit of reliable, authentic knowledge more, not less, difficult online, by drowning out traditionally credentialed cultural gatekeepers. Relatively few networked forums provide a truly democratic alternative to the focused, substantiated, reasoned — and elitist — debate that still governs the disciplines.

In some ways the fundamental limitation of the book (and here my interpretation must be taken with a grain of salt, because I am basing this on my reading of a review rather than the book) is imposed by the institutional frame that the authors start with. If you see knowledge in institutional terms it is not a surprise that the relative anarchy of the Internet seems to go against the need for authority and reliability.

Roy Amara famously said that “We tend to overestimate the effect of a technology in the short run and underestimate the effect in the long run,” and I wonder if the authors of the book (and all of us) are just too close to the Internet phenomena to truly understand how it is changing us (and also changing itself in the process). Of particular interest to me is how this new evolving frame of knowledge will lead to changes in how we teach.

Topics related to this post: Books | Engineering | Evolution | Learning | Technology | Worth Reading

A few randomly selected blog posts…

How to complete a half-marathon

I completed the Capital City River Run Half Marathon today. This race has become an annual event for me, this being my 7th outing so far (the first three years being a 10 mile run before it shifted into a half-maraton). [See links here, here and here]. I completed the...

How do we measure TPACK? Let me count the ways

The interest in the TPACK framework has led to a upsurge in ways of measuring TPACK development. Matt, Tae Shin and I recently published a survey paper on different ways of measuring TPACK, abstract and title given below. I was particularly pleased with the title we...

Word cloud

Tag or word clouds are visual visual depiction of user-generated tags or words on a website. The clouds give greater prominence to words that appear more frequently in the source text. Fonts, color, layouts can also be used to convey information. Now Kara Sevensma...

Speculative fiction and the future of learning

Speculative fiction and the future of learning

One of the most fun projects I have been part of was working with authors of speculative fiction around the futures of learning. This was the result of a collaboration with the Center for Science and the Imagination, Slate magazine and New America (supported by the...

Words & Worlds with Kij Johnson

Words & Worlds with Kij Johnson

Kij Johnson, an award- winning author, editor, and Associate Professor in the University of Kansas’s MFA in Creative Writing program. In her teaching Kij brings some serious credibility as an artist, scholar, and all-around “uber-geek.” Kij has published three novels,...

Leigh’s awesome acceptance speech at AACTE

As I had written earlier, the EPET Program received the 2013 Best Practice Award for the Innovative Use of Technology, awarded by the  American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education  (AACTE).  This is an incredible honor and makes all of us (faculty, staff, and...

Arriving in Malaysia

I am currently in Kuala Lumpur, arrived here last night, after spending a night at Delhi. I stayed with my old high-school buddy (Hartosh) and his wife, Paminder. We spent a nice evening chatting and catching up – since a lot had happened since we had last met, not...

On embodiment in online learning

Patrick Dickson just forwarded me an essay from the Chronicle of Higher Education, titled The Sensuous Classroom: Focusing on the Embodiment of Learning [Subscription required]. In this article Suzanne Kelly, the author, bemoans the absence of the physical body from...

TPACK in the SAGE Encyclopedia of Ed Tech

The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Technology, edited by Dr. Michael Spector just got published. We have one article in it on (no surprise there) TPACK! Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2015). TPACK (technological pedagogical content knowledge). In J. Spector (Ed.),...

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *