Cost of living

by | Tuesday, April 15, 2008

Being alive costs taxpayers trillions of dollars a year
First time research reveals staggering annual taxpayer cost for being alive

East Lansing, MI, April 15: In first-ever research, a new report quantifies a minimum 3 trillion annual taxpayer cost from citizens being alive. It identifies national, state and local costs which account for more than $10 trillion in the last decade. This landmark scholarly study, entitled “The Taxpayer Costs of Being Alive: First-Ever Estimates for the Nation and All 50 States,” was released on April 15th at the kitchen of one of the scholars.

“This study documents for the first time, that just being alive–besides being bad for global warming–are also costing taxpayers a ton of money,” said Dr. I. Kant, president of the Institute for zero government. “Even a small improvement in the reducing the number of living would result in enormous savings to taxpayers,” he continued.

“These costs are due to increased taxpayer expenditures for the military, health care, education, … um, pretty much everything we do,” said principal investigator Xi Wont, Ph.D., economics professor at Staid Midwestern University (SMU). “Prior research shows that low populations have smaller costs overall than larger populations.”

“This report now provides the basis for a national consensus that living is maybe the biggest contributor to costs in today’s world. This makes reducing the numbers living a legitimate policy concern,” said I Kant. “The report’s numbers represent an extremely cautious estimate, a lower-bound figure, and have been vetted by a group of distinguished scholars and economists.”

“These numbers represent real people and real suffering,” said Brandy Hiccups, president of Wee The Living. “Both economic and human costs make being alive a legitimate public concern. Historically, Americans have resisted the impulse to surrender to negative and hurtful trends. We fight problems like racism, poverty and domestic violence because we understand that the stakes are high. And while we’ll never eliminate the living entirely, we can certainly be doing more to help people who want to opt out succeed.”

I wrote this story after reading a recent report that stated that “Marriage breakdown costs taxpayers at least $112 Billion a year.” Actually “wrote” is too strong a word for what I did, which is essentially take the above report and re-edit it to meet my satirical goals. Don’t get me wrong, I am all for the institution of marriage but goofy studies such as this one do little to convince me. Merely tacking numbers on to a social phenomena do not make it “real.” There are costs to everything – and just because something has a cost attached to it does not mean we need to choose to do something different. There are many reasons to support marriage but I am not sure silly studies such as this one prove anything.

Topics related to this post: Fun | Personal | Worth Reading

A few randomly selected blog posts…

TPACK commercial, UPS/Whiteboard version

Our ISTE Radio/Video show needed a few commercials to break the monotony - so we created a couple. Here is the first one, a take on the UPS / Whiteboard commercials. Watch and enjoy (director's commentary provided below)....

SITE 2008, Trust and Digital Technologies

At SITE 2008 Andrea Francis and I presented a paper titled Why some teachers trust digital technologies and other don't? Abstract: Digital technologies have the potential to provide educators with new ways of instructing and learning. However, some educators still...

The hitchhiker’s guide to online doctoral programs, SITE2013

We finished our second symposium yesterday. Titled the The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Hybrid and Online Doctoral Programs the symposium included presentations by faculty members from Michigan State University and University of North Texas. Ann Thompson was our...

Links of interest

During Dr. Jalaluddin's keynote I took some time to search online for some reports, prompted by what he had been saying. (Yes I was listening not just browsing). The first is an European study: ICT in Schools: Trends, Innovations and Issues in 2006-2007. You can...



Just some visual wordplay that I have indulged in, just for the heck of it. Nothing really special, though I am partial to the "Explore, Create, Share" design. That was the motto of the MAET program at MSU that I directed for years.  Innovate 2 on Creativity...

Solving the rubik cube, blindfolded

A YouTube video of Soham solving the rubic cube blindfolded! [youtube width="425" height="355"][/youtube] [Thanks for Michael Gondry for the idea.]

Ideas are cool

My colleague and friend David Wong has this cool idea, about making ideas cool. Actually, he has been espousing these ideas for a while now (check out his scholarly publications, in particular The Rebirth of Cool [Word doc]). But now this academic has stepped out of...

Design & Creativity at Purdue

I will be at Purdue University, at the School of Engineering Education later this week, making a presentation titled: Unpacking Design and creativity: What I think I know, and what I (quite certainly) don't. I am quite looking forward to this trip, mainly because I...

The value of research

A few years ago I was asked to talk to some major donors of the College as a part of the kick-off of the MSU Capital Campaign. The text below is what I had written out prior to giving the talk. It is not an exact transcript of what I actually said, since I...


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *