Breaking free of academic publishers

by | Tuesday, February 12, 2008

It appears that the arts and sciences faculty at Harvard are considering publishing all their scholarship freely online. Here is a NYTimes story titled At Harvard, a Proposal to Publish Free on Web. This is truly wonderful news and long overdue. I have been doing this, at a personal level, through my website, for a long time – but have always felt a bit concerned about my legal standing. My solution has been to not make a big song and dance about it… though I have always faced questions about this at the Survive and Thrive sessions I have done for junior faculty. And I have never really had a very good answer.

I guess now I do.

According to the proposal currently being considered at Harvard, faculty members

… would deposit finished papers in an open-access repository run by the library that would instantly make them available on the Internet. Authors would still retain their copyright and could publish anywhere they pleased …[The idea would be to] create an ‘opt-out’ system: an article would be included unless the author specifically requested it not be.”

There are a couple of issues here, worth mentioning.

First, is my motivation for thinking this is a good idea. The bottom line, at least for me, is ensuring that what I write is read by as many people as possible. Since I work at a state funded university, I believe, the results of my research and scholarship should be freely available to the people who have paid for it. If Matt and I had not put our TCRecord piece out there on the web, I doubt our ideas would have received half the attention they did. People discovered the article, shared it with their colleagues and their students, and everything that has happened since then (the book, the special sessions at NTLS, SITE etc. etc.) is a consequence of its easy and immediate availability.

Second, is something I had alluded to in a previous posting (here), but would like to expand on a bit. It is interesting that it is the “big name” institutions that come out supporting these open-access initiatives (for instance MIT’s OpenCourseware and now this initiative from Harvard). I guess these institutions feel more secure in their position in the world, and thus more comfortable in sharing their information, than institutions with a weaker “brand.” Thus here at MSU we are having discussions about whether or not we should be utilizing the “cloud” for work we do here – or whether we stay cut off from the world, behind proprietary fire-walls. I had previously mentioned this article on the MSU website. Take a peek at it if you haven’t already. How backward looking is that?

Topics related to this post: Politics | Publications | Technology

A few randomly selected blog posts…

Banksy’s biggest trick OR why I hate art museums

I have been a fan of Banksy, the subversive British street artist, for a long time. I love the visuals he comes up with, the subversive quality of his art and most importantly his ability to take art out of the galleries into the real world. His most recent trick,...

Jabberwocky goes to graduate school

The 5th floor of Erickson Hall is a fun place to be. Typically a bunch of graduate students hang out there, working on their readings, talking shop and in general having a good time. For some reason, last week, I promised Josh Rosenberg that I would write a poem for...

Designing the futures of STEM education

Designing the futures of STEM education

“What knowledge is of most worth?” is a question asked over a 100 years ago by the English philosopher, Herbert Spencer. His unequivocal answer was—science. This question (and his answer) resonates even today, though the context within which it is asked, and how we...

Computational Thinking paper wins Outstanding Paper

Computational Thinking paper wins Outstanding Paper

A paper co-authored with Jon Good and Aman Yadav, building on Jon's practicum study has received the Outstanding Paper Award at the SITE 2017. Complete reference, link to article and abstract given below. Good. J., Yadav. A., & Mishra, P....

Palindromic Poetry

A few years ago I got bitten by the bug of Palindromic Poetry - poems that double back on themselves, that can be read this way, or that. This is consistent with my love for ambigrams and other kinds of symmetrical wordplay. Take a look...

Infusing creativity & technology in education

Infusing creativity & technology in education

Danah Henriksen, Petra Fisser and I have a new article (complete reference and link below). This article emerged from a Thematic Working group on Creativity in a technology enhanced curriculum that the three of us led at EduSummIT 2015 (see more here). This...

April 2, 2011… O frabjous day!

To understand the significance of April 2, 2011, I have to go back 28 years, back to the summer of 1983. I had just finished 10th grade, and that summer I took a trip to the hills of North India, as a part of a social work volunteer effort. I remember sleeping on the...

TPACK Newsletter #40, March 2019

TPACK Newsletter #40, March 2019

Here is the Special Spring 2019 Conference Issue of the TPACK Newsletter (#40, March 2019), as curated and shared by Judi Harris and her team. (Previous issues are archived here.) This special issue include all the TPACK-related papers/sessions that...

3 Comments

  1. Punya Mishra

    hmmm… don’t know how to respond to the previous comment, except to say that I hope I get a scholarship too 🙂

    Reply
  2. balivillabeach

    wow..do you want to study at Harvard university? Good luck bro and I hope you can get the scholarship 🙂

    Reply
  3. Ira Socol

    I find Michigan State’s resistance to the future quite remarkable, especially considering its historic role as a Land-Grant University. One of the basic missions of this institution is “extension” – the diffusion of knowledge and research beyond the campus community. By sealing itself and its research off from the world there is the unfortunate contribution to to the notion of an imperial university – an elitist community devoted to controlling those outside of the academe rather than a liberating force.

    Beyond that is the simple stupidity of the cost. MSU and other educational institutions spend tens of millions of unnecessary dollars each year for tech support that would be better provided by third party vendors. Google accounts (replacing MSU’s truly awful 1985 email system) and Moodle accounts (replacing the bizarre Angel system) could save each MSU student between $300 and $500 per year (by my rough calculations) while providing better, faster service with dramatically improved collaborative opportunities.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Punya Mishra Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *